Oh. So NOW You Call That Body Parts?
Ever since Roe v Wade gave women permission to abort their unborn children, the thought police have carefully and systematically worked to retrain our thinking. It's a fetus - not a baby. It isn't a child unless it is born. It's choice - not an abortion. It's women's health - not murder.
In spite of the facts about how many days after conception a heart is beating or there are fingerprints or even videos showing a baby smiling or hiccuping, we are told that is just intollerant, right-wing slander. People who point out that the baby is alive in the womb are damned as "anti women's health" or extremists against a woman's "right" to choose.
The number of weeks a baby can be aborted varies by state. I am anguished to report that some abortions occur at a genstational age where the baby would be able to live outside the womb as a preemie.
Instead of talking about the death of an aborted baby - his life ended by the mother's choice and a doctor's hand - we are told to concentrate only on the woman. It was "her right". She gets to decide who stays or who goes. No one talks about the baby's "right" because it's just a fetus. That wasn't a real baby - yet. We can't think that was a real baby and then have it sucked into a sink, can we? We have to reframe the noun we use so that a woman's "right" isn't a terrible thing. It is her body. We can't think about the baby's mutilated body. Remember? It is just a fetus.And, for some utterly unknown reason a woman who exercizes her "right" is brave.
I don't get it.
Anyone who tries to speak on behalf of humanity - much less the baby's very life - is dismissed as an intollerant extremist. A bigger negative deal is made about them than the act of aborting a baby.
The spin doctors and propagandists have done a wonderful job. They have convinced idle listeners that if you say something long enough it becomes culturally embraced as truth. The new truth is that the fetus doesn't count until it inhales air outside the womb. And remember, if you are against abortion you are ultimately against women. And isn't it morally unconscionable to hate women? Aren't women egual to men? If you are against women, you are an intollerant hater. Yes. Very. Well. Done. Score a million points for the Thought Police.
Well, even if the Thought Police have "won" the abortion redefinition, their win comes at the cost of a human life and societal demoralization no matter how desperately they try to change the focus.
Truth is truth no matter how you try to deny it or give yourself permission to look the other way. The truth is that a little someone's life is cut off every single time a woman exercizes her "right" to "choose". Ending a life is called murder. (Until the updated dictionary is published with the new definition of marraige along with the new, casual terms for murder.)
Funny thing is that if a pregnant woman is murdered and both mom and baby die, the public is outraged. Yet a pregnant woman the same number of weeks along is able to end a baby's life and people applaud her ability to exercize her options.
How has society become so callous? How is it that the aborters have the right to do so, but those opposing it are not entitled to exercize free speach? Is free speach only free to those who agree with you?
I am sorry I used that example because abortion is not something to agree or disagree with. You can't argue that a life is ended. Well, you can if you don't want to call it a life. But even if you don't want to call a fetus a baby - a life - it still is. You go right ahead and "disagree" with reality. (Then I "disagree" with the fact that humans generally have two legs. Outlandish.)
So now that it has been revealed that Planned Parenthood has been harvesting and selling aborted baby parts, there's a hint of public moral outrage. It was okay to kill the baby. Well, legal. But what? After you kill the baby you are gonna sell off the body parts in the best possible combinations for a profit?! Now that is going too far. Or is it? After all, isn't it a woman's right to choose? So, what if she chooses to sell off a lung or spleen?
For this week, the fetus parts are being refered to by everyone as "human body parts" instead. No one is bothering to correct or make the distinction that under the abortion mindset, the pre-born baby doesn't really count so we can't refer to anything about it as anything near a life. Not this week. Everyone agrees an organ is an organ. This corraborates my theory that deep down, everyone realizes that a womb-dweller is a baby. A human baby. With body parts.
And since that is the case, white-washing abortion using neutralized terminology and falsely attaching it to some women's rights agenda merely means denial. Remember, we have the admission from actual abortionists that those are body parts.
PS Every single woman I have ever met who has had an abortion has told me how haunted and ashamed she is.
The "women's rights" blasters neglect to do follow-up. The "right" profited a governmentally funded organization yet destroyed a living being AND her mother's soul.
#Truth #Exposed
In spite of the facts about how many days after conception a heart is beating or there are fingerprints or even videos showing a baby smiling or hiccuping, we are told that is just intollerant, right-wing slander. People who point out that the baby is alive in the womb are damned as "anti women's health" or extremists against a woman's "right" to choose.
The number of weeks a baby can be aborted varies by state. I am anguished to report that some abortions occur at a genstational age where the baby would be able to live outside the womb as a preemie.
Instead of talking about the death of an aborted baby - his life ended by the mother's choice and a doctor's hand - we are told to concentrate only on the woman. It was "her right". She gets to decide who stays or who goes. No one talks about the baby's "right" because it's just a fetus. That wasn't a real baby - yet. We can't think that was a real baby and then have it sucked into a sink, can we? We have to reframe the noun we use so that a woman's "right" isn't a terrible thing. It is her body. We can't think about the baby's mutilated body. Remember? It is just a fetus.And, for some utterly unknown reason a woman who exercizes her "right" is brave.
I don't get it.
Anyone who tries to speak on behalf of humanity - much less the baby's very life - is dismissed as an intollerant extremist. A bigger negative deal is made about them than the act of aborting a baby.
The spin doctors and propagandists have done a wonderful job. They have convinced idle listeners that if you say something long enough it becomes culturally embraced as truth. The new truth is that the fetus doesn't count until it inhales air outside the womb. And remember, if you are against abortion you are ultimately against women. And isn't it morally unconscionable to hate women? Aren't women egual to men? If you are against women, you are an intollerant hater. Yes. Very. Well. Done. Score a million points for the Thought Police.
Well, even if the Thought Police have "won" the abortion redefinition, their win comes at the cost of a human life and societal demoralization no matter how desperately they try to change the focus.
Truth is truth no matter how you try to deny it or give yourself permission to look the other way. The truth is that a little someone's life is cut off every single time a woman exercizes her "right" to "choose". Ending a life is called murder. (Until the updated dictionary is published with the new definition of marraige along with the new, casual terms for murder.)
Funny thing is that if a pregnant woman is murdered and both mom and baby die, the public is outraged. Yet a pregnant woman the same number of weeks along is able to end a baby's life and people applaud her ability to exercize her options.
How has society become so callous? How is it that the aborters have the right to do so, but those opposing it are not entitled to exercize free speach? Is free speach only free to those who agree with you?
I am sorry I used that example because abortion is not something to agree or disagree with. You can't argue that a life is ended. Well, you can if you don't want to call it a life. But even if you don't want to call a fetus a baby - a life - it still is. You go right ahead and "disagree" with reality. (Then I "disagree" with the fact that humans generally have two legs. Outlandish.)
So now that it has been revealed that Planned Parenthood has been harvesting and selling aborted baby parts, there's a hint of public moral outrage. It was okay to kill the baby. Well, legal. But what? After you kill the baby you are gonna sell off the body parts in the best possible combinations for a profit?! Now that is going too far. Or is it? After all, isn't it a woman's right to choose? So, what if she chooses to sell off a lung or spleen?
For this week, the fetus parts are being refered to by everyone as "human body parts" instead. No one is bothering to correct or make the distinction that under the abortion mindset, the pre-born baby doesn't really count so we can't refer to anything about it as anything near a life. Not this week. Everyone agrees an organ is an organ. This corraborates my theory that deep down, everyone realizes that a womb-dweller is a baby. A human baby. With body parts.
And since that is the case, white-washing abortion using neutralized terminology and falsely attaching it to some women's rights agenda merely means denial. Remember, we have the admission from actual abortionists that those are body parts.
PS Every single woman I have ever met who has had an abortion has told me how haunted and ashamed she is.
The "women's rights" blasters neglect to do follow-up. The "right" profited a governmentally funded organization yet destroyed a living being AND her mother's soul.
#Truth #Exposed
Comments
Post a Comment